‘Are you local?’ – writing about a place for Te Ara
Should the authors of Te Ara’s Places entries be locals?
Out of the 14 places entries up on the site so far, seven were written by people who were from that region, and seven by in-house writers with connections elsewhere. Having written the recently launched Hawke’s Bay entry from my desk in Wellington (with my roots in the rural settlement of Tauwhare near the Waikato town of Cambridge), this was something I often thought about. (An entry on Waikato is coming to Te Ara, via my colleague and former Hamiltonian Nancy Swarbrick, in 2010.)
One of the times authorship is discussed publicly is when these entries are launched. People – usually locals – often want to know if the author is also local. This is to be expected. Place informs an individual or community’s identity, and a strong attachment to birthplace or home town (whether long-standing or adopted) often follows. When something is written about your place you take notice, and perhaps go through the text with your fine-toothed comb in a way you might not if you went to Te Ara for a quick account of a cicada’s lifecycle or the seasonal stars in the night sky.
Obviously I concluded that an author didn’t have to be a local – if I hadn’t it would have been hard for me to write the thing. Rather, I decided that the most important requirements were those crucial to writing any Te Ara entry: thorough research, careful identification and analysis of the relevant issues, sensitive treatment of tricky or controversial topics, and rigorous in-house peer review further down the track. Specific to writing a good Places entry is contact with local people for information, getting good advice and reviews of the draft text, and paying the region a good, investigative visit.
It’s true that it would be very useful to have the existing knowledge of a local, but this can be accrued during the research process. The fact is, nobody – local or otherwise – can know all there is to know about a place without doing a lot of research. Though I spent the first 18 years of my life in Waikato, and go back regularly enough to retain my native status, I’d need to do the same amount of research as a non-local before I could write about it properly. And, while outsiders are often seen to be more impartial, a good local writer will not take sides or shy away from the tricky issues that often have to be written about in Places entries.
I don’t think that local status can be the final arbiter of whether a Places entry is authoritative. We’re not that parochial, are we? It’s the writing and the underlying research that counts. Local status is more like the icing on an already rich cake – but only if it’s made out of the right ingredients.
What do you think?
Posted 
Posted 
Posted 
Posted 


Posted 
