Skinks, dolphins and toatoa – and getting it right
Getting it right is a major expectation of Te Ara. But sometimes it’s not us, but our committed users, who put us right. Their emails can take us on fascinating journeys in the pursuit of truth. Recently we had three interesting examples.
The week began when Geoff Patterson wrote in to say that his colleague Dr David Chapple had determined in a recently published research paper that there was only one skink genus (Oligosoma), not two as we claimed in our lizards entry. So I sent this off to the author, Kerry-Jayne Wilson, who read the paper and agreed. Going to change the entry, I found it a little more difficult than I had imagined. The entry stated that of the two skink genera, one was endemic to New Zealand but the other had relatives only on Lord Howe and Norfolk islands (and we had a nice image of the Lord Howe cousin). So I was left wondering whether the Lord Howe Islander was also part of this expanded skink genus, or not. So back to Kerry-Jayne, who confirmed that it was indeed.
A couple of days later a representative of Ngāti Kuia wrote in to say that in the dolphins entry we had incorrectly named the dolphin which accompanied Hinepoupou on her legendary 80-kilometre swim from Kapiti to Rangitoto (D’Urville Island). He pointed out that Hinepoupou was from Ngāti Kuia and they believed the dolphin was called Kaikaiawaro, while we had it as Kahurangi. This time I wrote to John and Hillary Mitchell, who wrote the entry on Te Tau Ihu (the tribes at the north of the South Island). The Mitchells confirmed that Ngāti Kuia’s accepted name for the dolphin was Kaikaiawaro, but that kaumātua of other iwi in the area agreed the name was Kahurangi. So we changed the entry to acknowledge both traditions. Interestingly, it was not only the dolphins entry which needed changing. The open water swimming entry also had the story of Hinepoupou and Kahurangi/Kaikaiawaro (so we updated that too).
The third letter came in from Stephen King, whom I quickly recognised as the famous person who sat on top of the tōtara tree in Pureora Forest in 1978 as a protest against clear-felling. Stephen, now the forest ecologist at Waipoua Forest, asked us to change the reference to toatoa from being common in northern forests to being rare in Northland. He said that at Waipoua the species was found only on one ridge, and he was concerned that people collected bark from the trees for dye. It was important to get the facts right to dissuade people from unnecessary collection. Again, I referred the comment to the original author, in this case Maggy Wassilieff, who noted that she confined the use of the term ‘rare’ to those species that appeared on the published list of ‘Threatened and uncommon plants in New Zealand’. But she accepted that it was indeed not often found in Northland, so we made an appropriate change.
It’s great that our users want to see us get these things right. It shows they care and it is a huge help to us. The job does not stop - just one day after a new law came in banning the use of cell phones while driving, I received an email telling us that we say New Zealand is one of the few developed countries that has not banned cell phones when driving. So, the corrections, and keeping Te Ara up-to-date, continue.
Posted 
Posted 
Posted 






Posted 

