Dem bones
A team of scientists (Janet Wilmshurst, Atholl Anderson, Thomas Higham, Trevor Worthy) have recently published a paper dating Polynesian settlement of New Zealand at around 1280 AD. They radiocarbon dated 30 Pacific rat bones and over 100 rat-gnawed woody seed cases to reach their conclusion, which agrees with other evidence that New Zealand was first settled around 1250–1300 AD. This new research also confirms the conclusions that we came to in our entry ‘When was New Zealand first settled?‘, published more than three years ago.
However, their findings contradict some 1996 research carried out by Richard Holdaway. He radiocarbon dated rat bones, which, in some cases, gave dates over 1000 years earlier. If these dates were correct, then Pacific rats (and so humans as the rats can only have arrived on canoes), first arrived as early as 200 BC. In this scenario, the humans must have either died or sailed away. Given the latest evidence, this much earlier arrival scenario does not hold much weight anymore, although Holdaway is sticking by the accuracy of his dates. There have been questions about the reliability of rat bones in this research, and it seems probable that there are other reasons for the carbon dates not giving the true age of the bones.
Science relies on empirical methods and repeatable observations to arrive at the truth, and no other researchers have replicated Holdaway’s findings. Given the weight of evidence, the current consensus is that Polynesians first arrived in both the North and South islands of New Zealand, around 1280 AD.
Posted 
Posted 

Posted 
